Employee Performance Evaluation Model Based on Digital Footprints Using Machine Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22303/csrid-.17.3.2025.421-435Keywords:
Employee Performance Evaluation, Digital Footprint, Machine Learning, Random Forest, SMOTE, Feature Selection, Performance Prediction, HRM DataAbstract
Employee performance evaluation is a crucial aspect of human resource management, yet traditional methods are often subjective and less effective. This study develops an employee performance evaluation model based on digital footprint using machine learning algorithms to provide a more objective and fair assessment. Data were collected from 2,435 employees, including 16 input variables related to digital work activities, wearable and health data, work perception and satisfaction, competencies, and organizational information, with two output variables: Performance_Score and Performance_Label. The research stages included feature selection using ANOVA F-test, data preprocessing (missing value imputation and normalization with RobustScaler), class balancing using SMOTE, splitting the dataset into training (2,688 samples) and testing (672 samples) sets, and training models with Logistic Regression, Decision Tree, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, KNN, SVM, and Naïve Bayes. Model evaluation was performed using accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and confusion matrix metrics. The results show that Random Forest achieved the best performance with an accuracy of 0.872 and F1-score of 0.871, followed by Gradient Boosting (accuracy 0.830, F1-score 0.827) and Decision Tree (accuracy 0.826, F1-score 0.822). KNN and SVM exhibited moderate performance, while Logistic Regression and Naïve Bayes had the lowest results. The most influential features were Organization Support Score, Tech Skills Score, Physical Activity Steps, Daily Working Hours, and Overtime Hours Monthly. The machine learning-based model, particularly Random Forest, is effective for employee performance evaluation based on digital footprints, enabling more objective, fair, and accurate assessments.
References
M. Barry and A. Wilkinson, ‘Employee voice, psychologisation and human resource management (HRM)’, Hum. Resour. Manag. J., vol. 32, no. 3, 2022, doi: 10.1111/1748-8583.12415.
T. D. N. Vuong and L. T. Nguyen, ‘The Key Strategies for Measuring Employee Performance in Companies: A Systematic Review’, Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 21, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su142114017.
K. M. Omar, ‘Factors Motivating Human Resources Management (HRM) in the Public and Private Sectors’, Open J. Bus. Manag., vol. 09, no. 02, 2021, doi: 10.4236/ojbm.2021.92036.
Joel Rodriguez and Kelley Walters, ‘The Importance of Training and Development in Employee Performance and Evaluation’, Int. J. Peer Rev. J. Ref. J. Index. J. UGC Approv. J. Impact Factor, vol. 3, no. 10, 2017.
A. Fitriana et al., ‘Decision support system of employee performance evaluation’, Int. J. Eng. Adv. Technol., vol. 8, no. 6 Special Issue 2, 2019, doi: 10.35940/ijeat.F1307.0886S219.
Mutinda Teguh Widayanto, Yuliana, Ismawati, and Nurdin Natan, ‘Implementation Of Performance Assessment To Determine Employee Performance’, Int. J. Sci. Technol. Manag., vol. 2, no. 5, 2021, doi: 10.46729/ijstm.v2i5.302.
J. Flanagan and R. K. Burns, ‘The Employee Performance Record: a New Appraisal and Development Tool’, Harv. Bus. Rev., vol. 79, no. July, 2020.
P. C. Agu, E. E. Njoku, S. Umaru, N. I. Eleke, I. H. Nwokoma, and O. T. Bashiru, ‘Records Management and Organizational Performance’, ARRUS J. Soc. Sci. Humanit., vol. 2, no. 2, 2022, doi: 10.35877/soshum738.
Y. Pan and F. J. Froese, ‘An interdisciplinary review of AI and HRM: Challenges and future directions’, Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev., vol. 33, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2022.100924.
S. Lada, B. Chekima, M. Rahimie Abdul Karim, N. F. Fabeil, and M. Salleh Ayub, ‘Determining factors related to artificial intelligence (AI) adoption among Malaysia’s small and medium-sized businesses’, J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex., vol. 9, no. 4, Dec. 2023.
D. Gélinas, A. Sadreddin, and R. Vahidov, ‘Artificial intelligence in human resources management: A review and research agenda’, Pacific Asia J. Assoc. Inf. Syst., vol. 14, no. 6, 2022, doi: 10.17705/1pais.14601.
H. Li, Q. Wang, J. Liu, and D. Zhao, ‘A Prediction Model of Human Resources Recruitment Demand Based on Convolutional Collaborative BP Neural Network’, Comput. Intell. Neurosci., vol. 2022, 2022, doi: 10.1155/2022/3620312.
K. Patel et al., ‘RanKer: An AI-Based Employee-Performance Classification Scheme to Rank and Identify Low Performers’, Mathematics, vol. 10, no. 19, 2022, doi: 10.3390/math10193714.
P. Sujatha and R. S. Dhivya, ‘Ensemble Learning Framework to Predict the Employee Performance’, 2022, doi: 10.1109/ICPC2T53885.2022.9777078.
I. Ahmed, I. Sultana, S. K. Paul, and A. Azeem, ‘Employee performance evaluation: A fuzzy approach’, Int. J. Product. Perform. Manag., vol. 62, no. 7, 2013, doi: 10.1108/IJPPM-01-2013-0013.
R. Lv, ‘Research on human resource management performance evaluation based on BP algorithm’, Appl. Math. Nonlinear Sci., vol. 8, no. 2, 2023, doi: 10.2478/amns.2021.2.00302.
A. S. Lather, R. Malhotra, P. Saloni, P. Singh, and S. Mittal, ‘Prediction of employee performance using machine learning techniques’, 2019, doi: 10.1145/3373477.3373696.
M. Siahaan, ‘An Analysis of Contract Employee Performance Assessment Using Machine Learning’, J. INFORMATICS Telecommun. Eng., vol. 5, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.31289/jite.v5i1.5357.
Tanti, L., Rahmad, I. F., & Thanri, Y. (2018, August). Monitoring and Evaluation of Flight Instructor Performance with PROMETHEE Method. In 2018 6th International Conference on Cyber and IT Service Management (CITSM) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
Thanri, Y. Y., & Nasution, F. P. (2020). Model Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Dalam Menentukan Operator Caroline Officer Inbond 188 Terbaik dengan Metode AHP Dan SMART Berdasarkan Rekam Jejak Kinerja Operator. Jurnal Media Informatika Budidarma, 4(4), 1100-1118.
Thanri, Y., Sipahutar, L., & Putri, F. A. (2021). PENENTUAN NILAI KINERJA PADA OPERATOR MENGGUNAKAN DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM DENGAN METODE COPRAS. CSRID (Computer Science Research and Its Development Journal), 13, 296-305.
Thanri, Y. Y., Sipahutar, L., Tanti, L., & Safrizal, S. (2021). SPK DALAM PEMILIHAN KARYAWAN TERBAIK MENGGUNAKAN METODE PADA PT. FANTASI ERESTAMA CEMERLANG. PUBLIDIMAS (Publikasi Pengabdian Masyarakat), 1(1), 85-91.
Thanri, Y.Y., 2020. Rekam Jejak Kinerja Crew Sebagai Model Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pengangkatan Leader. JURNAL MEDIA INFORMATIKA BUDIDARMA, 4(1), pp.96-102.









