Comparison of Waste Type Classification Using Convolutional Neural Network with ResNet18 and ResNet50 Architecture

Authors

  • Christin Evasari Nainggolan Universitas Bina Darma image/svg+xml
  • Muhammad Nasir
  • Fatoni
  • Devi Udariansyah

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22303/csrid-.16.1.2024.76-90

Keywords:

Garbage Classification, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), ResNet18, ResNet50

Abstract

Complex problems occur in dealing with waste, both in developing and developed countries, such as Indonesia. According to data from the Ministry of Environment and Forestry, in 2022 the total waste pile will reach 34,439,338.12 tons per year. In this research, machine learning will be used by comparing CNN architecture, ResNet18 with ResNet50, for the classification of waste types. This research uses 2527 images of garbage image data consisting of 6 classes, namely cardboard, glass, metal, paper, plastic and trash. Convolutional Neural Network is a component of the Deep Neural Network method that has the ability to identify objects in images with a high level of complexity. From the ResNet18 model test in this study, the accuracy was 98.69% and the test results on ResNet50 resulted in an accuracy of 99.41%. The precision and recall results of both models reflect excellent performance and accuracy of around 99%. So it can be concluded that both CNN models, ResNet18 and ResNet50, have excellent performance in classifying garbage images.

References

Rima Dias Ramadhani, A. Nur Aziz Thohari, C. Kartiko, A. Junaidi, T. Ginanjar Laksana, and N. Alim Setya Nugraha, “Optimasi Akurasi Metode Convolutional Neural Network untuk Identifikasi Jenis Sampah,” J. RESTI (Rekayasa Sist. dan Teknol. Informasi), vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 312–318, 2021, doi: 10.29207/resti.v5i2.2754.

N. Marliani, “Pemanfaatan Limbah Rumah Tangga Sbg Implementasi Plh,” J. Form., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 124–132, 2014, [Online]. Available: https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/234976-pemanfaatan-limbah-rumah-tangga-sampah-a-533e820b.pdf

H. H. T. Takbiran, “Bank Sampah Sebagai Alternatif Strategi Pengelolaan Sampah Menuju Sentul City Zero Emission Waste Kabupaten Bogor,” IJEEM - Indones. J. Environ. Educ. Manag., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 165–172, 2020, doi: 10.21009/ijeem.052.05.

B. M. Sujatmiko, E. Yudaningtyas, and P. M. Raharjo, “Convolutional Neural Network Using ResNet Network Design As Skin Tumor Classification Method,” vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 53–64, 2022.

K. Uyar, Ş. Taşdemir, and I. A. Özkan, “The analysis and optimization of CNN Hyperparameters with fuzzy tree model for image classification,” Turkish J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci., vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 961–977, 2022, doi: 10.3906/ELK-2107-130.

Stephen, Raymond, and H. Santoso, “Aplikasi Convolution Neural Network untuk Mendeteksi Jenis-Jenis Sampah,” Explor. – J. Sist. Inf. dan Telemat., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 122–132, 2019.

E. Jing, H. Zhang, Z. Li, Y. Liu, Z. Ji, and I. Ganchev, “ECG Heartbeat Classification Based on an Improved ResNet-18 Model,” Comput. Math. Methods Med., vol. 2021, p. 6649970, 2021, doi: 10.1155/2021/6649970.

R. Permana, H. Saldu, and D. I. Maulana, “Optimasi Image Classification Pada Jenis Sampah Dengan Data Augmentation Dan Convolutional Neural Network,” J. Sist. Inf. dan Inform., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 111–120, 2022, doi: 10.47080/simika.v5i2.1913.

I. R. Ramadhani, A. Nilogiri, and A. Qurrota, “Klasifikasi Jenis Tumbuhan Berdasarkan Citra Daun Menggunakan Metode Convolutional Neural Network Classification Of Plants Based On Leaf Image Using Convolutional Neural Network Method,” J. Smart Teknol., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 2774–1702, 2022, [Online]. Available: http://jurnal.unmuhjember.ac.id/index.php/JST

A. Solihin, D. I. Mulyana, and M. B. Yel, “Klasifikasi Jenis Alat Musik Tradisional Papua menggunakan Metode Transfer Learning dan Data Augmentasi,” J. SISKOM-KB (Sistem Komput. dan Kecerdasan Buatan), vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 36–44, 2022, doi: 10.47970/siskom-kb.v5i2.279.

T. A. Bowo, H. Syaputra, and M. Akbar, “Penerapan Algoritma Convolutional Neural Network Untuk Klasifikasi Motif Citra Batik Solo,” J. Softw. Eng. Ampera, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 82–96, 2020, doi: 10.51519/journalsea.v1i2.47.

Z. Niswati, R. Hardatin, M. N. Muslimah, and S. N. Hasanah, “Perbandingan Arsitektur ResNet50 dan ResNet101 dalam Klasifikasi Kanker Serviks pada Citra Pap Smear,” Fakt. Exacta, vol. 14, no. 3, p. 160, 2021, doi: 10.30998/faktorexacta.v14i3.10010.

S. F. Tumewu, D. H. Setiabud, and I. Sugiarto, “Klasifikasi Motif Batik menggunakan Metode Deep Convolutional Neural Network dengan Data Augmentation,” J. Infra, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 189–194, 2020.

H. Fonda, “Klasifikasi Batik Riau Dengan Menggunakan Convolutional Neural Networks (Cnn),” J. Ilmu Komput., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 7–10, 2020, doi: 10.33060/jik/2020/vol9.iss1.144.

F. F. Maulana and N. Rochmawati, “Klasifikasi Citra Buah Menggunakan Convolutional Neural Network,” J. Informatics Comput. Sci., vol. 1, no. 02, pp. 104–108, 2020, doi: 10.26740/jinacs.v1n02.p104-108.

Downloads

Published

2024-03-19

How to Cite

Comparison of Waste Type Classification Using Convolutional Neural Network with ResNet18 and ResNet50 Architecture. (2024). CSRID (Computer Science Research and Its Development Journal), 16(1), 76-90. https://doi.org/10.22303/csrid-.16.1.2024.76-90

Similar Articles

1-10 of 30

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.